🔗 Share this article

An activist group has stated to have scraped millions of songs from the popular streaming service and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts noted the apparent data breach could aid AI companies searching for material to train their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and album names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not represent its full inventory.

“We have located and deactivated the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a company representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorized access identified a external actor collected public metadata and used questionable methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Mission and Worries

Spotify does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group claimed the music files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would probably be utilized for training AI models.

“Training on pirated material is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to a large online archive, a huge online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been leveraged by Meta to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “create their own personal free version of the service”. The executive said it could also allow technology firms to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Copyright has become a battleground between artists, authors and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Responses

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government proposal to allow AI companies use protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.